Howardism Musings from my Awakening Dementia
My collected thoughts flamed by hubris
Home PageSend Comment

Cultural and Mystical Fusions

I know, yet another esoteric title, but I've been wondering about something that I can't quite describe any other way. Let me begin with a story… you probably don't know Cuauhtlatoatzin, nor could you probably pronounce his name (so it is a good thing he changed his name to Juan Diego), but you may heard of Our Lady of Guadalupe.

Juan Diego was a native Mexican, a Nahuan actually, who was described as a ascetic mystic who converted to Christianity. In the winter of 1531, the Virgin Mary appears to him and tells him that she wants a cathedral built on Tepeyac Hill (on the eastern edge of Mexico City). The local bishop doesn't believe him and needs some signs… well, you can probably guess how this story ends. The cathedral is the second most visited shrine in Catholicism, a few years ago, Juan was sainted, and no one can remember that bishop's name.

But it isn't the story itself that has me thinking… Was it coincidence that Tepeyac Hill was a spot where an Aztec temple to the goddess Tonantzin stood? I don't think so. This cathedral (and the story) marks a cultural fusion between the native people's beliefs and the new conquerering religion.

Throughout history, this sort of fusion is extremely common, but I had always wondered whether this fusion of cultures is pre-meditated or does it just happen? And by the term, "just happen", I am referring to the laziness factor

Let's suppose our tribe just conquered another city. Clearly, our god must be better than theirs, so we must appease our god (and gloat) by tearing down the loosing god's temple and building one to our own. At least that is what our cleric says. After the gleeful destruction are we going to head to the quarries for some rocks? No way, we'll just use the stones from the temple we pulled down. Are we going to haul the stones to our temple's new location? No way, we'll just build on the foundation of the loosing god's temple. The laziness factor at work, and that's how we got the Cathedral of Notre Dame and many others.

Sometimes the laziness factor is so strong only the name plate on the door is changed. Once upon a time, there was this goddess named Bridget (or Bride) who would show up on her holy day (February 2nd) to help with birthing the lambs and people, and generally bless the place. She had a temple in Kildare, Ireland where her priestesses lived and kept a perpetually burning flame.

Well, the goddess Bridget is now Saint Bridget, her holy day is now called Candlemas (February 2nd), her priestesses are now nuns, and the temple is now a monastery. Sure, they've added wings and a fresh coat of paint, but the fire is still burning.

But the story of Juan Diego is different in that it is the looser who is asking to integrate, not the winner placating the masses. There are advantages for both sides to merge the cultures. It allows the "converts" a chance to keep some of their older traditions and it keeps them connected with their past and their identity. Along with keeping the masses pacified, the ruling conquerers get to enrich their own culture with new stories and traditions.

But cultural fusion, while to some extent, is inevitable, I shed a tear whenever I hear foreign musicians and singers use Western scales and American pop techniques. I find the original Coyote stories with their scatalogical references to be far deeper than the bleached versions. I suppose for the first time in our history, we can actually archive a culture before it is lost in fusion. But good luck finding anything aboriginal that hasn't already been fused.

Tell others about this article:
Click here to submit this page to Stumble It


I've spent some time searching out traditional cultures in far away places, and I've noticed something interesting. People seem to assume that the "conquering" culture wants to replace the traditions of the old culture. But more often I've seen that the conquered culture actively wants to take on the culture of the conquering culture. I guess they see it as more modern and successful.

Let me give an example. When I lived in England, I had several friends who were from Bulgaria (this is when Bulgaria was still communist). I've always been interested in traditional Bulgarian music, so when they would visit home they would bring back tapes of traditional music for me. But they would never listen to it themselves. They preferred American music. And when I actually went to Bulgaria, the only place I ever heard anyone playing traditional music was at a wedding.

The interesting effect is that Americans seem to want to preserve traditional cultures from other countries more strongly than the people who actually live in those countries.

Another example: it seems to be easier to find a pub to listen to traditional Irish music in Portland than it is in Ireland. You go to a pub in Ireland, and you're much more likely to hear rock music.

I guess when people leave their homes for a new place like America, we are more concerned about holding on to the old culture and preserving it.

—Wm Leler
24 February 2005


I'm not sure if I buy into the idea of shrinking culture. On one end of it, there certainly is homogenization. I saw a lot of it in Germany, where most of the songs played on the radio are from North America, and nearly everyone can speak English to some extent, not to mention the McDonalds and a Burger King down the road a bit.

But, on the other end, new culture is constantly being created. Look at the feminist, civil rights, and green movements in the last fifty years -- heck, even the Catholic church has received it's share of reform in the last century.

Personally, I think the scales will weigh out towards diversity, simply because the population is growing, and it's becoming easier and easier to find both diverse opinions and likeminded people.

24 February 2005


Ah Howard-- only you can take me from the wonders of my corporate office and wisk me away to philosohical bliss of thought.

As for Diego and the conversion that occurred with his sighting and Bridget and her sainthood is very simply the yin and yang of religion constantly revinventing itself to the same message; there is a being or force, we cannot truly define what it is beyond that we are a part of it thus, in our frustration or ego, we seek to define "it" according to our times, experiences or lust for power. What better power than to conquer another's definition of the highest power that still remains undefined?

History repeats itself; Chritianity did it to pagan's, Muslim's to Judeaism (dome of the rock) etc… so we see it again in the "modern" west of Mexico.

I don't know if religion was your ultimate example here but as a microcosim of thought for that point I can only say that your phenomena will continue to occur until we reach monotheism. Why? The world needs monotheism for only it can provide true universalism. And only it can provide peace and justice for all. Until then, my god is better than yours :-)

25 February 2005